There is a discussion around
the narrative that the Modi government has mismanaged the reforms that have
struck the economic growth rate negatively when it was already in a recovery
mode since there has been a heightened expectations that interest rate would go
down more to aid the speed of growth from the past slowdown and rate hike cycle,
however transition from a non-reform period to a reform period requires certain
amount of adaptation, the economy adapts from one policy or set of rules to
others which might also create uncertainty for a period because people take
time to practice the new set of rules based on the information, both demonetization
and GST were such kind of reforms, demonetization was also a reform, a reform
to curb tax evasion and black money…
Therefore, these
reforms were long pending only Modi government has brought them to the fore,
they we needed… How would you tell people that black money is illegal and it is
also a hit on the revenue, it is true that revenue deficit has lowered
expectations from the government, tight fiscal deficit numbers might divulge in
the case of lower private investment, nonetheless increasing productivity would
help increase competitiveness and demand and growth… Spending on the skill development
according to the industry demand is likely to create more employment since it would
also increase demand for teachers and trainers… The supply of labour must accommodate the
demand of labour otherwise there would unemployment… More spending on
education, skills and innovation would be anti-inflationary because production
could increase despite of full-employment…
Onething the Modi
government did from the onset was to infuse a sense of “Achche-din” in the minds
of the people which has given rise to expectations of better days ahead which
might give rise to spending in the expectations of better incomes in the future,
even the economists try to paint a good picture of the future, ie good
expectations about future to increase consumption and investment spending…