Brazil’s case is
clearly an example of fiscal splurging which has made the both, domestic and export
sector, uncompetitive by increasing the prices internally, although it has
increased depreciation, but higher interest rates have also worked against
depreciation by increasing the borrowing cost, even though it has cut down on
real-wages by inflation. Its policies are contradicting themselves, they lack a
definite direction. Depreciation through inflation would have worked if
interest rate was kept steady. Higher interest or cost of borrowing is restraining
the competitiveness from depreciation that has resulted in low exports and domestic
investment. The difference in fiscal-policy and monetary-policy is that the
latter increases supply and demand, both, whereas that former only increases
demand and infrastructure, and not goods and services which have made inflation
out of control. The fiscal-doles and freebies by the government instead of
improving the supply-side by the private sector has indeed crowd-out the
private investment by increasing the interest-rates. Too much government spending
has not only increased the borrowing cost for the private-sector which has a
greater role in supply of goods, moreover it has also made the exports dearer
by increasing the capital-cost. The economy’s inflation and high interest have kept demand/supply low for the internal and the external sector. To curb
inflation the economy must increase the supply by lowering interest rate, but
this time fiscal spending might be saved for the time when the private sector
is reluctant to invest, which would also provide the government an opportunity
to lower its fiscal burden. Budget pruning that lowers employment is not
recommended because it is already above the natural rate and the growth rate is
going down. The interest-rate cut would help reduce unemployment and improve
the supply-side to reduce inflation against the argument that rate cut would
aggravate inflation, but new government spending may be avoided because that
would crowd-out private invest as it has done before. The inflation we are
seeing in the economy could be attributed to too much government spending. Sensible
economics says that the selic must be brought down to increase private investment
and control fiscal slippage.
Friday, October 30, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The resulting surge in aggregate demand and consumption-led economic activity can create a positive multiplier effect.....
A significant decrease in Goods and Services Tax (GST) rates could lead to a revenue loss of approximately ₹48,000 crore annually, but thi...
-
India's public debt, encompassing the center and state governments, is a significant component of the overall debt landscape, and its ...
-
Employment can be viewed as both a demand variable and a supply variable in the labor market. Businesses, as employers, demand labor to pr...
-
In the absence of a reserve currency, a token system could be used for international trade settlements by creating a globally accepted dig...
No comments:
Post a Comment