The fiscal deficit, the gap between expenditure and
revenue, and the cumulative borrowings or debt of the government over the
years, back, has been a topic of debate between economists over the sustainability
of debt that might involve risk because of overheating and bubbles in the
economy. Both, spending by the government and the private sector through
borrowing might lead to the tightening of the credit and trade cycles. Debt is
not a problem till your financials are sound and revenues robust, and your
economy is moving, but when things are not going the right way, i.e. during
recessions or slowdown when there is high unemployment, low wages and demand
then the Public-Debt makes more sense because the private sector is not doing
fine. Higher public-spending increases employment, demand and growth during
downturns through the multiplier. However, to use it on time you must have low
debt to borrow more during the crisis. Too much public-debt in the Western-world
made the countries to spend less during the recession when they should spend
more to create employment. Therefore, we might point-out that the fiscal-policy
should be used in the times or crisis or rainy days during the downturns for
which it has to garner revenue during the booms to control inflation and
overheating.
Under these perspectives INDIA too might draw a right
framework for its fiscal-policy that downturn is a time for spending and booms are a time for revenues and consolidation to control demand and overheating.
Overheating and high inflation fail to give the outcome we want higher wages,
incomes, demand and growth, actually real wages, incomes, demand and real
growth-rate. Inflation lowers the real GDP and lower inflation might increase
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment