In economics, inequality is measured using various tools, with the Gini coefficient being the most widely used. The Gini coefficient measures the extent to which the distribution of income or wealth deviates from a perfectly equal distribution, ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality). Other measures include the Lorenz curve, decile ratios, the Palma ratio, and the Theil index.
Key Measures of Inequality:
Gini Coefficient:
A numerical measure of inequality, ranging from 0 to
1, where 0 represents perfect equality and 1 represents perfect inequality.
It's calculated as the ratio of the area between the Lorenz curve and the
45-degree line to the total area below the 45-degree line.
Lorenz Curve:
A graphical representation of the distribution of
income or wealth, showing the cumulative percentage of income or wealth held by
the cumulative percentage of the population. The closer the curve is to the
45-degree line, the more equal the distribution.
Decile Ratios:
Measures the ratio of income or wealth of the top
decile (10%) of the population to that of the bottom decile (10%). For example,
the D90/D10 ratio compares the income of the top 10% to the bottom 10%.
Palma Ratio:
A specific type of decile ratio that compares the
income of the top 10% to the income of the bottom 40% of the population. This
ratio is particularly useful for understanding how tax policies and social
transfers impact inequality at the extreme ends of the distribution.
Theil Index:
An index that measures inequality based on the
deviation between the income shares and the population shares. It's sensitive
to changes in inequality at different parts of the distribution.
Factors Influencing Inequality:
Income Distribution: The way income is distributed
among individuals or households within a society.
Wealth Distribution: The way wealth (assets) is
distributed among individuals or households.
Consumption Inequality: How the total sum of money
spent by people is distributed.
Tax Policies: Progressive tax systems can help reduce
income inequality by taxing higher earners more.
Social Transfers: Government programs that provide
assistance to low-income individuals and families can help reduce inequality.
Limitations of Inequality Measures:
Data Availability:
Reliable data on income and wealth distribution can be
challenging to collect and may not be available for all countries or time
periods.
Measurement Issues:
Different inequality measures can produce different
results, depending on the assumptions and methods used.
Contextual Factors:
Inequality is influenced by a complex interplay of
economic, social, and political factors, making it difficult to isolate the
specific causes of inequality.
The Gini coefficient for India is currently forecast
to be 0.35 in 2024. This value represents the level of income inequality in the
country. A Gini coefficient of 0.35 is considered moderate, indicating a
moderate level of income inequality, according to various sources.
Elaboration:
Gini Coefficient:
The Gini coefficient is a measure of income
inequality, ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 represents perfect equality and 1
represents perfect inequality.
India's Gini Coefficient:
For 2024, the Gini coefficient is projected to be
0.35, indicating that income is not perfectly evenly distributed among the
population.
Comparison:
While the specific Gini coefficient value for India is
0.35, it's important to note that the Gini coefficient for China is forecast to
be 0.37. This suggests that China might have a slightly higher level of income
inequality compared to India in 2024.
Data Source:
The Statista Market Forecast provides data on various
socioeconomic indicators, including the Gini coefficient, for India.
In 2024, the Lorenz curve for India likely shows a
significant deviation from the line of perfect equality, indicating a
considerable degree of income inequality. The Gini coefficient, a measure
derived from the Lorenz curve, is likely to be above 0.35, suggesting a
substantial gap in income distribution.
Elaboration:
Lorenz Curve:
The Lorenz curve is a graphical representation that
depicts income distribution within a population. It plots the cumulative
percentage of income earned by the cumulative percentage of the population,
starting from the poorest to the richest.
Line of Equality:
A diagonal line on the Lorenz curve represents perfect
equality, where each percentage of the population earns exactly that percentage
of the total income.
Deviation from Equality:
The further the Lorenz curve deviates from the line of
equality, the greater the income inequality.
Gini Coefficient:
The Gini coefficient is a numerical measure of income
inequality, calculated based on the area between the Lorenz curve and the line
of equality. It ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality).
India's Income Inequality:
Studies have shown that India's Lorenz curve is
significantly shaped by income inequality, with the top 10% and top 1% holding
a substantial portion of the total income. According to the World Inequality
Report 2022, India is among the most unequal countries in the world, with the
top 10% and top 1% of the population holding 57% and 22% of the total national
income respectively.
Bottom 50%:
The share of the bottom 50% of the population in total
income is relatively small, around 13-17%, highlighting the disparity in income
distribution.
The Palma ratio for India is approximately 1.5. This
means that the income share of the richest 10% is 1.5 times higher than the
income share of the poorest 40%.
Explanation of the Palma Ratio:
The Palma ratio is a measure of income inequality that
compares the income share of the richest 10% to the income share of the poorest
40% of a country's population.
A Palma ratio of 1 indicates that the richest 10% and
the poorest 40% have the same income share.
A ratio greater than 1 suggests that the richest 10%
have a disproportionately larger share of income compared to the poorest 40%.
Conversely, a ratio less than 1 indicates that the
poorest 40% have a larger share of income than the richest 10%.
In the case of India:
The Palma ratio of approximately 1.5 suggests that the
richest 10% of the Indian population earn significantly more than the poorest
40%.
In 2024, India's poverty rate fell below 5%, with
rural poverty dropping to 4.86% and urban poverty to 4.09%, according to a SBI
research based on the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey. This sharp
decline is attributed to higher consumption growth in the lowest deciles,
particularly in rural areas.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Rural Poverty:
The poverty ratio in rural areas dropped to 4.86% in
FY24, a significant reduction from 7.2% in FY23. This decline is linked to
higher consumption growth in the lowest 5% of the population, indicating
improved living standards for the poorest segments.
Urban Poverty:
The poverty ratio in urban areas also decreased to
4.09% in FY24, down from 4.6% in FY23.
Decile Ratio:
The World Inequality Database provides data on income
and wealth distribution, including decile ratios. While they don't explicitly
provide a "decile ratio" for 2024, they show a substantial increase
in the share of national income held by the top 10% (top decile) and a
corresponding decrease in the share held by the bottom 50%, according to a
report on the World Inequality Database. This suggests a widening income gap
between the rich and the poor.
For a more precise understanding of the decile ratio
in 2024, you might need to consult the World Inequality Database directly or
other sources that provide detailed income and wealth distribution data for
that year.
In 2024, the share of labor income in India's national
income is estimated to be around 52-54%, while the share of capital income is
around 46-48%. This means that labor income, which includes wages and salaries,
represents a slightly larger portion of the total income generated in India
compared to capital income, which includes profits and returns on investment.
Elaboration:
Labor Income:
This refers to the income earned by workers, including
wages, salaries, and other forms of compensation for their labor.
Capital Income:
This refers to the income earned from capital assets,
such as profits from businesses, returns on investments, and rental income.
Trends:
While the share of labor income in national income has
been generally stable, some studies suggest a slight decline in the share of
labor income over the past two decades, particularly in some countries. This
trend is often attributed to factors such as automation, globalization, and
increasing inequality in income distribution.
India's Context:
In India, the share of labor income is influenced by
various factors, including the growth of the economy, the level of employment,
and the distribution of income across different sectors.
Economic Implications:
The share of labor income and capital income in
national income has significant economic implications, including:
Income Inequality: Higher labor income shares can help
reduce income inequality, as it ensures that workers receive a larger share of
the benefits of economic growth.
Economic Growth: A balanced distribution of income
between labor and capital can lead to sustainable economic growth, as it
stimulates both consumption and investment.
Social Welfare: A higher share of labor income can
lead to improvements in social welfare, as it ensures that workers have more
disposable income to meet their basic needs.
Policy Considerations: Governments can use various
policies to influence the share of labor income and capital income, including
wage regulations, tax policies, and social programs.
In 2024, the share of private sector capital in
India's economy showed a mixed performance. While private capital investments
in India surged, they also declined in certain areas compared to the previous
year. Overall, the private sector's Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF)
remained a significant portion of the GDP.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Overall Investment:
Private Equity Surge:
Private equity investments in India surged by 46% to
$15 billion.
Global Leadership in Exits:
India topped the world in private capital exits, with
$27.9 billion in 2024.
Decline in Investment:
Despite the exit activity, private capital investment
in India declined by 17% year-on-year to $22.7 billion.
Surge in Private Sector CAPEX:
India's first report on private sector CAPEX trends
showed a 66 percent surge in private firm investments in FY 2024–25 compared to
FY 2021–22.
Sector-Specific Investments:
Internet-Specific Investments:
The Internet-Specific sector saw a significant increase
in equity investment, with 368 deals totaling $4.49 billion.
Communications:
The Communications industry experienced a substantial
surge in equity investment.
Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals:
These sectors were significant drivers of the overall
growth in private capital investments.
Consumer-Related Industries and Technology:
These sectors also contributed to the growth in
private capital investments.
Other Notable Points:
Private Sector GFCF: Private sector GFCF as a share of
GDP in India was 26.7% in 2022.
Objectives of CAPEX: A survey indicated that nearly
49.6% of private corporate sector enterprises undertook CAPEX for income
generation, while 30.1% directed investments towards upgradation.
Debt Reduction: The private sector focused on reducing
debt instead of expanding.
In summary, …The share of labor
income in India's national income is estimated to be around 52-54% in 2024,
while the share of capital income is around 46-48%. These shares reflect the
relative contributions of labor and capital to the overall income generation
process in India. while private capital investments in India showed strong
growth in certain areas, particularly in private equity and specific sectors
like internet and communications, there was also a decline in overall
investment compared to the previous year. The private sector's GFCF remained a
significant portion of the GDP, with a focus on income generation and
upgradation through CAPEX investment,.
No comments:
Post a Comment