The formal economy is characterized by registered businesses, codified labor laws, traceable transactions, standardized contracts, and verifiable data that is collected, recorded, and regulated by government and official institutions. The informal economy, conversely, operates largely outside these structures. When an economy like India has an estimated 90% of its workforce and economic activity residing in this informal sphere, the nature, availability, and utility of "data" diverge significantly from what one would expect in highly formalized nations. The sheer scale of this informality in India does not just mean "missing data"; it signifies a fundamentally different data ecosystem—one that is fragmented, often qualitative rather than quantitative, and difficult to standardize.
What We Could Expect of Data in a 90% Informal Economy
If 90% of an economy operates informally, the
expectations for data can be categorized into several key areas: data
availability and quality, economic visibility, policy challenges, and
alternative data sources.
1. Poor Data Availability and Quality
The most direct expectation is the absence of
reliable, official data for the vast majority of economic activity.
Missing Core Economic Indicators: Standard metrics
like GDP contributions by specific sub-sectors of the informal economy, precise
employment figures, and real-time wage data become estimates at best. National
statistical organizations must rely heavily on periodic, large-scale sample
surveys rather than routine administrative data.
Lack of Firm-Level Data: Data on business formation,
revenue, expenditure, and investment for millions of small, unregistered
enterprises (e.g., street vendors, home-based workers, small-scale agriculture)
are virtually non-existent in official registries.
Untaxed and Untracked Transactions: Because
transactions are often cash-based and unregistered, administrative data
gathered from tax receipts (like the Goods and Services Tax, or GST) captures
only a fraction of the total economic flow, leading to a significant "dark
figure" of economic activity [1].
2. Limited Economic Visibility and Inaccurate Policy
Making
The lack of reliable data creates a visibility problem
for economists and policymakers, leading to expectations of:
Inaccurate Official Narratives: Official economic
growth figures may underrepresent the true economic resilience or vulnerability
of the informal sector. The data fails to tell the full story of how most
citizens live and work.
Ineffective Policy Calibration: When the data on the
primary labor market is sparse, government interventions—whether minimum wage
laws, credit availability schemes, or social security programs—struggle to
effectively reach the intended beneficiaries. Policies designed for the formal
sector often fail to translate to the needs of informal workers.
Vulnerability Assessment Difficulties: It becomes
nearly impossible to accurately assess the impact of sudden shocks (like a
pandemic or a natural disaster) on the most vulnerable populations without
real-time, accurate data on their livelihoods and savings.
3. Fragmentation and Siloed Information
The existing data in such an economy is expected to be
fragmented across different sources.
Siloed Data Sources: Instead of unified data systems,
information is likely scattered across various local government bodies,
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focused on specific worker groups (e.g.,
waste pickers' unions), microfinance institutions, and academic research
projects.
Reliance on Alternative and 'Big Data': There is an
increased reliance on "proxy data" or "alternative data."
This might include satellite imagery for agricultural tracking, mobile phone
data for population movement and commerce patterns, or digital payment data
from financial technology (FinTech) firms operating in the space. These sources
offer new insights but come with their own biases and privacy concerns.
4. The Emergence of 'Qualitative' Data Importance
In the absence of robust quantitative data,
qualitative research methods become crucial.
Case Studies and Ethnography: The data that is
available often comes from in-depth case studies, ethnographic research, and
localized surveys conducted by researchers to understand the nuances of
informal markets, supply chains, and social networks. This data provides rich
context but is not easily scalable or generalizable to the national level.
In an economy where 90% of activity is informal, the
expectation of data must be fundamentally managed. The data ecosystem will be
characterized by significant gaps, measurement challenges, and a reliance on
fragmented, often non-traditional data sources. The journey toward greater
formalization, as seen in recent initiatives in India like the push for digital
payments and labor registries (such as the e-Shram portal), is essentially a journey
to create better data. Until that formalization is achieved, policymakers must
navigate a challenging landscape where broad national statistics tell an
incomplete story, necessitating innovative approaches to data collection and a
nuanced understanding of the vast, complex, and data-sparse informal reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment