i think this was the right time in the US to complement monetary policy with fiscal policy. The government should come up with a plan that can raise wages and income, and, demand. There has been a productivity and wages/income gap within the economy since 1970. The US tried to devalue its currency in an attempt to cash foreign demand by putting more money in the other country’s people’s pockets with out any labor (at least, there is no binding) in the form of exchange rate, especially when the currency depreciates. Then why not the US government is putting more money in people’s pocket in its own country… The government has to simply take care of people below poverty… i mean the government should increase spending on the poorest but then I see that the people are already covered with food and health insurance. But this spending has made the government budget bloated by crowding out private businesses. The timing was not right. Keyes has advocated fiscal policy in the face of recession and liquidity trap. But Classicals advocated supply side (production) to push wages and demand. Any policy ultimately, if it is good, affects income positively in any form from any side, monetary and fiscal. When government spends and taxes it is fiscal and when the Reserve- Bank moves its monetary because it affects money supply. Interest rates are already zero and QE is an unconventional tool. But both monetary and fiscal policy can boost incomes and demand…
Saturday, June 22, 2013
Income Gap...
i think this was the right time in the US to complement monetary policy with fiscal policy. The government should come up with a plan that can raise wages and income, and, demand. There has been a productivity and wages/income gap within the economy since 1970. The US tried to devalue its currency in an attempt to cash foreign demand by putting more money in the other country’s people’s pockets with out any labor (at least, there is no binding) in the form of exchange rate, especially when the currency depreciates. Then why not the US government is putting more money in people’s pocket in its own country… The government has to simply take care of people below poverty… i mean the government should increase spending on the poorest but then I see that the people are already covered with food and health insurance. But this spending has made the government budget bloated by crowding out private businesses. The timing was not right. Keyes has advocated fiscal policy in the face of recession and liquidity trap. But Classicals advocated supply side (production) to push wages and demand. Any policy ultimately, if it is good, affects income positively in any form from any side, monetary and fiscal. When government spends and taxes it is fiscal and when the Reserve- Bank moves its monetary because it affects money supply. Interest rates are already zero and QE is an unconventional tool. But both monetary and fiscal policy can boost incomes and demand…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Data-Driven Comparison of Indian Economic Growth under Manmohan Singh and Narendra Modi.....
The economic performance of India under different political dispensations is a subject of intense debate, often complicated by changes in ...
-
Monetary policy operates with a significant lag, meaning today's interest rate decision affects inflation several quarters in the fut...
-
Stock markets are mechanisms of collective foresight. The current price of a stock is not just a reflection of its present value, but pri...
-
India has demonstrated remarkable technological advancement and is a major global player in IT and IT-enabled services, with its digital ec...
No comments:
Post a Comment