Probably, money demand
and money supply are not directly responsible for changes in the price level or
inflation, but the availability of goods and services in the economy which is
determined by the demand and supply in the goods and services in the market,
though the demand and supply of money decide the level of interest rate or
borrowing cost in the economy, which has a significant effect on the demand and
supply in the economy and the demand and supply of labour in the economy. But,
the borrowing cost or the natural real interest and the wage cost or the
natural real wage rate after full employment start falling due to the evidence
of inflation put by the Phillips curve which could affect savings in the
economy, nonetheless, the demand for money as put by Keynes has three functions
- consumption, precautionary and speculative demand for money. But, here we are
talking about just the speculative demand for money or the savings that go for
investment and a rise in the general price level after full employment would
affect the savings or supply of money which could further lower real interest
rate and savings. We see that any deviation from the natural real rate would
magnify itself, either inflation or deflation. In this situation higher
borrowing cost would further increase inflation by restricting the supply of
the economy. But, it is true that the price level could fall before the full
employment because supply could be increased by lowering the borrowing cost and
use the excess labour supply or international trade, after it higher nominal
wage cost could increase due to tight labour market, labour would demand higher
wages to relocate which itself would put a lid on labour demand and wage cost
inflation. Higher wage cost would help increase population and demand, but only
slowly which could help increase supply and growth in the long run. Higher
wages are important at this stage because our population growth is going down
and higher supply has depressed the prices globally. Higher inflation, higher
wages and higher borrowing cost, at the same time, would make the economy
uncompetitive and lose demand supply and growth; still lower borrowing cost
would help contain the cost and prices. The evidence from Japan, the US and
Europe has shown that prices are not increasing due to the falling population
growth rate.
Though, not very clear
why there is a difference between price level targeting and inflation targeting since both are the same, probably, inflation is the price level or general
price level in the economy... Nonetheless, a higher price level or inflation target
could help increase demand, because prices rise when demand increase or higher
demand means higher prices, therefore if the Fed targets higher demand it may
also increase the price level or inflation target. Similarly, if we have
to target higher supply we must again target higher prices, but due to
irrational expectations or exuberance the market supplies more which increases
price corrections and prices may start falling. But, due to utility or profit
making function people still would buy at lower prices which means lower prices
increase demand and prices which increase demand and profits, but, again due to
irrational expectations or exuberance people also often demand more than supply
and prices overshoot... This has been taken from the stock market which is
often prone to irrational exuberance and risks, the market skids due to, both
domestic and external factors which is very common, even in this age of
internet and information, long term investment in a good and cheap stock with
higher price target are safe compared to others. Any economy or stock is not
fully insulated from external shocks, too, when cheap dollar denominated money
has boosted investment and asset prices, not even backed inflation in the
emerging markets... Nonetheless, higher prices expectations not supported by
demand and supply and fundamentals could force correction in the market or the
economy.... Moreover, a 2% price target is too low to increase investment
demand, for example the Fed has let only .02 dollar inflation in a dollar which
is too low to increase investment employment supply and demand and prices and
growth...
No comments:
Post a Comment