More competition, more supply, even from imports and
simple FDI too should keep prices in check for a larger set of consumers
compared to producers subset... farmers are also consumers... And, a good thing
is that a farmer does not buy grain, they are sellers... it is the excess of
what he can consume so his food problems are partly solved... if any farmer
does it he is making a mistake, because he is then buying it from the market at
a higher price... not wise... food problems are for the rest of us... Villages
are full of good and nutritious food... most farming is done in small
villages... but it is devoid of good education and close markets... The
long-run trend found in the west that as money-supply has increased more supply
of goods and services has kept prices in check except oil... is opposite of
what the quantity theory of money says... In short, lower prices ahead and the
region is also ahead in terms of jobs (quality too) and the standard of
living... I do not know about Europe but as far US is concerned, after Paul
Volcker (a former fed chief) inflation remained under control within the
comfort levels below 10 % even after increases in oil prices... so to reduce
subsidy market is the best strategy...
Food is problem for those who is not growing it... it is a problem for
others... So food prices rise or fall it does not impact the rural-population
nutrition charts... Extreme poverty is a partial condition... Not a general
observation... mostly attached to cities... More farmer income will directly benefit
the industry... And when 50% population of INDIA is seasonal occupied by the agriculture...
it is major source of income... a big sector... a lot of population is
dependent on agriculture... alot of demand will be generated... This will work in
through the multipliers (actually accelerator)... The more industry will pay
the more it will reap... The government is increasing cost in the middle...
Agricultural subsidies will be paid by the market... They would invest in
storage... Market is competitive it would cut the costs... When it will become
profitable more investment would follow... INDIA is populated... Scale is too
big for investors... Just like a cheap and volatile share... Volatility increases
the risk for investors and returns high... The more you can buy the more you can
sell... more profits... Very good investment...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MGNREGA Vs VB-G RAM G.....
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), enacted in 2005 under the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) governme...
-
Monetary policy operates with a significant lag, meaning today's interest rate decision affects inflation several quarters in the fut...
-
Stock markets are mechanisms of collective foresight. The current price of a stock is not just a reflection of its present value, but pri...
-
India has demonstrated remarkable technological advancement and is a major global player in IT and IT-enabled services, with its digital ec...
No comments:
Post a Comment