A further interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve (Fed) could fuel inflation and inflation expectations by encouraging a flood of spending and investment into an already strong economy. In contrast, rate cuts are conventionally used to stimulate growth when the economy is sluggish. The risk of stoking inflation is particularly high when a country's economic growth is already robust.
How interest rate cuts spur inflation
Encourages borrowing and spending: The Fed lowers the
federal funds rate, which is the interest rate banks charge each other for
overnight loans. This action causes other interest rates to fall throughout the
economy, including mortgage rates, car loans, and credit card rates. This makes
borrowing cheaper for both businesses and consumers, encouraging increased
spending and investment.
Decreases savings incentive: Lower interest rates
diminish the return on savings accounts and bonds. This disincentivizes saving
and motivates individuals and businesses to spend or invest their money
elsewhere in pursuit of higher returns, further increasing the money supply in
the economy.
Boosts asset prices: As investors seek higher returns,
they may shift money from low-yield bonds and savings into assets like stocks
and real estate, inflating prices in those markets. This can also create a
wealth effect, where individuals feel wealthier and increase their spending.
Weakens the currency: A cut in interest rates can
weaken the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies. A weaker
dollar makes imports more expensive, which contributes to inflation.
Conversely, it makes U.S. exports cheaper for foreign buyers.
Why inflation expectations matter
Changes in interest rates influence not just current
inflation but also future expectations of inflation. These expectations can
become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Behavioral changes: If the public and businesses
expect higher prices, they will change their behavior. Workers will demand
higher wages to keep up with the rising cost of living, and companies may raise
prices in anticipation of higher costs and demand. This cycle of rising wages
and prices further fuels inflation.
Fed credibility: A key responsibility of the Fed is to
maintain price stability, with a long-term inflation target of 2%. If the Fed
is perceived as cutting rates too aggressively or at the wrong time, it could
lose credibility in its commitment to fighting inflation. This can unmoor
inflation expectations, making it more difficult to control prices in the
future.
The Phillips Curve: This economic model describes an
inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation. The logic is that as
employment increases and approaches its "maximum" level, the labor
market becomes tighter. This drives up wages and ultimately leads to higher
inflation. Cutting rates to ensure maximum employment when the labor market is
already strong risks pushing inflation beyond the Fed's target.
The Fed's balancing act
The Fed's actions are complicated by its "dual
mandate" to promote both maximum employment and stable prices. This
requires balancing the risks of a weakening job market against the risk of
reigniting inflation.
In one scenario, the Fed may cut rates in response to
a softening labor market, as J.P. Morgan projected in September 2025. However,
if inflation remains elevated due to other factors (such as tariffs or
supply-chain issues), further rate cuts could lead to a tough choice between
supporting jobs and controlling inflation.
In another scenario, if the economy is already near or
at full employment, as some recent reports suggest, further rate cuts are more
likely to have an inflationary impact than to stimulate real growth.
Conclusion
A further Fed interest rate cut holds the potential to
stoke inflation by increasing the money supply and encouraging a spending and
borrowing spree. This effect is magnified when the economy is already robust.
Critically, these rate cuts can also influence inflation expectations, a
powerful driver of actual price increases. The challenge for the Fed lies in
balancing its dual mandate of promoting maximum employment and stable prices,
especially when these two goals pull policy in different directions. The risk
is that misjudging the economy's strength could cause the Fed to lose
credibility as a bulwark against inflation, further destabilizing prices.
No comments:
Post a Comment