India risks transforming its potential demographic dividend into a significant socio-economic liability.....

 India's development strategy has faced significant criticism for prioritizing physical infrastructure development over essential investments in human capital, an approach that has arguably championed unskilled employment and contributed to a substantial skill mismatch in its workforce. While this infrastructure focus aims to boost economic growth, comparative data with other developing economies highlights persistent underinvestment in social sectors like education and health, hindering the creation of a highly skilled labor force.

The Investment Imbalance

The Indian government has consistently increased its capital investment outlay for infrastructure, reaching an allocation of ₹11.21 lakh crore (around 3.1% of GDP) for the infrastructure sector in the 2025-26 Union Budget. This massive push in roads, railways, and urban development has created substantial demand for construction and related activities, which primarily absorb low-skilled and unskilled labor.

In stark contrast, government expenditure on human capital development remains low compared to international benchmarks.

Healthcare: India's government health spending was about 1.1% of GDP in 2021 (FY22), significantly lower than the average of 1.7% for middle-income countries and about 3.5% below the average of BRICS nations (excluding India). The total health expenditure (public and private) stands around 3.8% of GDP.

Education: Government education expenditure in India was 4.64% of GDP in 2021. While this is closer to high-income country averages, peer nations like Brazil (5.8% of GDP in 2020) and South Africa (6.6% in 2023) allocate a higher share of their GDP to education.

Vocational Training: Only about 5% of India's labor force has undergone any formal skill training, a figure that pales in comparison to Germany (75%), the UK (68%), and South Korea (96%).

This persistent underinvestment has led to a workforce that is largely unskilled; an estimated 88% of India's young workforce is unskilled.

Consequences: Unskilled Labor and Skill Mismatch

The emphasis on infrastructure-led growth, without a corresponding investment in skills, has created a paradox: a massive potential "demographic dividend" that remains largely "unemployable" in high-productivity sectors due to a lack of relevant skills.

Job-Skill Mismatch: A significant mismatch exists between the skills possessed by the educated youth and the demands of the job market. An Economic Survey revealed that only 8.25% of graduates are employed in roles matching their qualifications, with over 50% working in elementary or semi-skilled jobs that do not require their education levels. This results in underemployment and a "dead-weight loss" of the expenditure on higher education.

Informal Sector Dominance: The organized sector, which often demands higher skills, is highly automated and does not generate enough jobs. The unorganized or informal sector accounts for over 90% of employment, and workers here often engage in low-paying, low-productivity tasks.

Comparative Disadvantage: While countries like China focused on developing a skilled manufacturing workforce to become a global manufacturing superpower, India has struggled with slow employment growth in manufacturing, with a large portion of the labor force remaining in the agricultural sector.

By channeling resources primarily into physical infrastructure rather than human capital, the Indian government's strategy has, by design or default, sustained an economy largely dependent on a vast, unskilled labor pool. Data suggests a critical failure to equip the burgeoning youth population with the necessary skills for a modern, globalized economy. Without a fundamental shift towards substantial and targeted investment in education, healthcare, and formal skill development, India risks transforming its potential demographic dividend into a significant socio-economic liability, falling further behind other developing nations that have successfully prioritized human capital formation.